{"id":1678,"date":"2008-01-27T20:30:04","date_gmt":"2008-01-27T19:30:04","guid":{"rendered":"http:\/\/www.megatopie.info\/arcadia\/2008\/01\/27\/lieux-communs-01272008\/"},"modified":"2008-01-27T20:30:04","modified_gmt":"2008-01-27T19:30:04","slug":"lieux-communs-01272008","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"http:\/\/www.culturedel.info\/cactusacide\/?p=1678","title":{"rendered":"Lieux communs 01\/27\/2008"},"content":{"rendered":"

ERM0811.pdf (Objet application\/pdf)<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

tags: 2.0<\/a>, educati<\/a>, learning<\/a>, on<\/a><\/p>\n

dmal.9780262524834.119 (Objet application\/pdf)<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

tags: boyd<\/a>, r\u00e9seaux_sociaux<\/a><\/p>\n

Google Research Home<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

tags: google<\/a>, research<\/a><\/p>\n

L’emprise du dieu google sur la recherche et notamment en amont<\/p>\n

Une th\u00e8se de doctorat sur la collaboration de masse | Michel Leblanc, M.Sc. commerce \u00e9lectronique. Marketing Internet, consultant, conf\u00e9rencier et auteur<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

tags: stigmergie<\/a><\/p>\n

Encore de nouveaux concepts \u00e0 explorer mais je manque de temps<\/p>\n

Instructional Technology Resources<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

tags: digital_natives<\/a><\/p>\n

Life after Google, with millions | CNET News.com<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

tags: google<\/a>, xooglers<\/a><\/p>\n

08.pdf (Objet application\/pdf)<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

tags: culture_of_information<\/a>, information_literacy<\/a><\/p>\n

Digital Literacy does not = Information Literacy<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

tags: digital_literacy<\/a>, information_literacy<\/a><\/p>\n

silver in sf: digital literacy – spring 2008<\/a><\/strong><\/p>\n

tags: digital_literacy<\/a><\/p>\n

Response to Jenkins, Prensky Regarding Digital Natives : UberNoggin: Big Brains – Big Ideas<\/a><\/strong>  Annotated<\/a><\/p>\n

tags: digital_natives<\/a>, jenkins<\/a>, jeunes_g\u00e9n\u00e9rations<\/a>, prensky<\/a><\/p>\n

Finalement l’auteur per\u00e7oit les diff\u00e9rences g\u00e9n\u00e9rationnelles par rapport \u00e0 leur histoire voire historique par rapport aux objets techniques.<\/p>\n

L’auteur reste sur la division en montrant qu’il faut sans doute la relativiser mais n\u00e9anmoins songer qu’il ne faudrait pas non plus r\u00e9agir en conqu\u00e9rants face aux \u00ab\u00a0natives\u00a0\u00bb en bannissant leurs usages notamment du portable et de wikip\u00e9dia.<\/p>\n

\n
However, the group we call \u201cnatives\u201d, today\u2019s kids, are not haunted by earlier similar technologies. Their use of a cell phone is not hindered by their functional assumptions carried over from using a party line at home, for example. They aren\u2019t intimidated by a 16 button console controller because they never played Atari with two buttons and a joystick. They adopt technologies easier because, for lack of a better phrase, they don\u2019t know any better. They have no reason to be afraid of a new tool or to be fearful of a new gadget. I watch my 6 year old triplets pick up gadgets, poke at them, test them, and then use them much faster than I ever would simply because they aren\u2019t afraid of them (probably because they didn\u2019t pay for them, as I remind them when they play with my iPhone).<\/div>\n